mastouille.fr est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Mastouille est une instance Mastodon durable, ouverte, et hébergée en France.

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

720
comptes actifs

#computationalscience

0 message0 participant0 message aujourd’hui

New preprint on our "collaborative modelling of the brain" (COMOB) project. Over the last two years, a group of us (led by @marcusghosh) have been working together, openly, online, with anyone free to join, on a computational neuroscience research project

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

This was an experiment in a more bottom up, collaborative way of doing science, rather than the hierarchical PI-led model. So how did we do it?

We started from the tutorial I gave at @CosyneMeeting 2022 on spiking neural networks that included a starter Jupyter notebook that let you train a spiking neural network model on a sound localisation task.

neural-reckoning.github.io/cos

youtube.com/watch?v=GTXTQ_sOxa

Participants were free to use and adapt this to any question they were interested in (we gave some ideas for starting points, but there was no constraint). Participants worked in groups or individually, sharing their work on our repository and joining us for monthly meetings.

The repository was set up to automatically build a website using @mystmarkdown showing the current work in progress of all projects, and (later in the project) the paper as we wrote it. This kept everyone up to date with what was going on.

comob-project.github.io/snn-so

We started from a simple feedforward network of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons, but others adapted it to include learnable delays, alternative neuron models, biophysically detailed models, incorporated Dale's law, etc.

We found some interesting results, including that shorter time constants improved performance (consistent with what we see in the auditory system). Surprisingly, the network seemed to be using an "equalisation cancellation" strategy rather than the expected coincidence detection.

Ultimately, our scientific results were not incredibly strong, but we think this was a valuable experiment for a number of reasons. Firstly, it shows that there are other ways of doing science. Secondly, many people got to engage in a research experience they otherwise wouldn't. Several participants have been motivated to continue their work beyond this project. It also proved useful for generating teaching material, and a number of MSc projects were based on it.

With that said, we learned some lessons about how to do this better, and yes, we will be doing this again (call for participation in September/October hopefully). The main challenge will be to keep the project more focussed without making it top down / hierarchical.

We believe this is possible, and we are inspired by the recent success of the Busy Beaver challenge, a bottom up project of mathematics amateurs that found a proof to a 40 year old conjecture.

quantamagazine.org/amateur-mat

We will be calling for proposals for the next project, engaging in an open discussion with all participants to refine the ideas before starting, and then inviting the proposer of the most popular project to act as a 'project lead' keeping it focussed without being hierarchical.

If you're interested in being involved in that, please join our (currently fairly quiet) new discord server, or follow me or @marcusghosh for announcements.

discord.gg/kUzh5MHjVE

I'm excited for a future where scientists work more collaboratively, and where everyone can participate. Diversity will lead to exciting new ideas and progress. Computational science has huge potential here, something we're also pursuing at @neuromatch.

Let's make it happen!

Very interesting and detailed paper by Thimbleby (2024) on how to improve computational methods in science (software engineering principles, reproducible analytic pipelines, enhancing the role of code in the scientific workflow etc).

Paper is #OpenAccess here: academic.oup.com/comjnl/articl

There's also a version with a long appendix that summarizes software engineering best practices: harold.thimbleby.net/paper-seb

OUP AcademicImproving Science That Uses CodeAbstract. As code is now an inextricable part of science it should be supported by competent Software Engineering, analogously to statistical claims being

"We thus model the committed evolution of all glaciers in the European Alps up to 2050 using present-day climate conditions, assuming no future climate change. We find that the resulting committed ice loss exceeds a third of the present-day ice volume by 2050, with multi-kilometer frontal retreats for even the largest glaciers."

Cook, S. J., Jouvet, G., Millan, R., Rabatel, A., Zekollari, H., & Dussaillant, I. (2023). Committed ice loss in the European Alps until 2050 using a deep-learning-aided 3D ice-flow model with data assimilation. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL105029. doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105029 #OpenAccess #OA #Research #Science #STEM #Glaciers #Climate #Data #AI #Europe #ComputationalScience #ClimateChange #Environment #Artificialintelligence #Academia #Academic #Academics @science @climate

Revised preprint: "Establishing trust in automated reasoning"

osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/nt9

More and more scientific reasoning is automated via software and machine learning. Users of these tools rarely understand their inner workings in detail. They are exempt from peer review. Can we trust them? On what basis? Under which conditions? Can we do better? These are the questions I address in this paper.

#MetaScience #ComputationalScience

A little summary 🧵

New paper out: The Nature of Computational Models
doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2023.3286

Preprint: hal.science/hal-04148865

#ComputationalScience

Computational models lie at the heart of computational science, yet few scientists have a clear idea of what a computational model actually is. I argue that in the most general case, computational models are formal specifications. I explain the relations between specifications, algorithms, software, and mathematical functions and equations, and I discuss examples.

ieeexplore.ieee.orgThe Nature of Computational ModelsComputational models lie at the heart of computational science, yet few scientists have a clear idea of what a computational model actually is. Is it software? Or an algorithm? How does it relate to mathematical models? What are suitable languages or notations for expressing a computational model in the literature? And will AI make computational models obsolete?

Yesterday, Gil Strang gave his final lecture at MIT. It was monumental enough to be live streamed with guests coming in to talk about his influence. The fact that it was a normal class lecture is so appropriate. It is the end of an era in #teaching.

I only visited MIT once, for an ASA conference, but Strang has affected my life deeply. His teaching of linear algebra is the best I have ever seen, full stop.

youtube.com/live/lUUte2o2Sn8?f

Fully funded 4 year #PhD in my group, supported by EPSRC available!

Come work on the cutting edge of understanding how mutations alter the #aging tissue and influence #cancer development. Study how mutant clones spread and interact in the tissue with #computationalscience.

Recent graduates have been highly successful taking positions in industry and academia.

See my lab web page to learn more about our work- hall-lab.com

ucl-epsrc-dtp.github.io/2023-2

Hall LabResearch | Hall LabThe Hall lab at UCL studies the impact of mutation in aging tissues and cancer. We use techniques from a wide range of domains in computational biology with a goal to help patient treatment and stratification.