Créer un compteSe connecter

Recherches récentes

Aucune recherche récente

Options de recherche

Disponible uniquement lorsque vous êtes connecté.
mastouille.fr est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Mastouille est une instance Mastodon durable, ouverte, et hébergée en France.

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

1,1K
comptes actifs

mastouille.fr: À proposAnnuaire des profilsPolitique de confidentialité

Mastodon: À proposTélécharger l’applicationRaccourcis clavierVoir le code sourcev4.3.4

#disgorgementofprofits

0 message0 participant0 message aujourd’hui
Sarah Fackrell<p>And the underlying decision (by Judge Seeger): <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilnd.422932/gov.uscourts.ilnd.422932.51.0.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">storage.courtlistener.com/reca</span><span class="invisible">p/gov.uscourts.ilnd.422932/gov.uscourts.ilnd.422932.51.0.pdf</span></a></p><p>"The Court declines the request to award profits because Plaintiff offered evidence of revenue, not profits. Revenue and profits are not the same thing. The Court declines the invitation to assume that all of the revenue equals profits." </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ScheduleA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ScheduleA</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Remedies" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Remedies</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/DisgorgementOfProfits" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DisgorgementOfProfits</span></a></p>
Sarah Fackrell<p>Note that the disgorgement provision of the Lanham Act expressly addresses burden shifting (unlike the Copyright Act and §&nbsp;289 of the Patent Act): "In assessing profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove defendant’s sales only; defendant must prove all elements of cost or deduction claimed."</p><p><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1117" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15</span><span class="invisible">/1117</span></a></p><p>So this provision provides the best support for the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ScheduleA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ScheduleA</span></a> "we can't prove their profits so give us the whole account" argument.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Remedies" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Remedies</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/DisgorgementOfProfits" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DisgorgementOfProfits</span></a></p>
ExplorerFlux en direct
À propos