sheislaurence<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://zeroes.ca/@StaceyCornelius" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>StaceyCornelius</span></a></span> I absolutely wouldn't rely on this research, or risking giving the impression that "only 3.5% will do". No, we need way more. <br>After reading A LOT of research on <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/tippingpoints" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tippingpoints</span></a> & <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/socialchange" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>socialchange</span></a>, I trust Damon Centola's <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/networkdynamics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>networkdynamics</span></a> research which set the threshold at 25%. Here is a very quick video, but I would recommend reading "How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions"</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhY2y__43z8" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">youtube.com/watch?v=qhY2y__43z8</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>PS: 25% <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/handsoff" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>handsoff</span></a> is well within reach.</p>