Ars Electronica<p>As <a href="https://social.ars.electronica.art/tags/neurotechnology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>neurotechnology</span></a> advances, exemplified by Neuralink's brain chip, <a href="https://social.ars.electronica.art/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a>-powered brain decoders, and consumer EEG headbands, we are approaching an era where the harvesting of neural <a href="https://social.ars.electronica.art/tags/data" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>data</span></a> by corporations could become commonplace. This technological progress raises critical privacy concerns. It has catalyzed legislative initiatives aimed at establishing "neurorights" to safeguard individual mental <a href="https://social.ars.electronica.art/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a> and autonomy against unregulated access and exploitation. <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/24078512/brain-tech-privacy-rights-neurorights-colorado-yuste" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">vox.com/future-perfect/2407851</span><span class="invisible">2/brain-tech-privacy-rights-neurorights-colorado-yuste</span></a></p>