Alexander Knochel<p>Relativity is relatively subtle, exhibit A, and a pet peeve of mine in the communicaton of special relativity to students and the public. It is usually simplified to the point of seeming inconsistent, thus fueling crackpot ideas.</p><p>1) It is usually said that in the theory of relativity, time goes more slowly for a moving clock than for one at rest.</p><p>2) It is also said that there is no absolute movement or rest in relativity. </p><p>The two statements contradict each other. If movement and rest are a matter of perspective, which clock runs slower then? Both? None? Was Einstein wrong???</p><p>Spoiler: No.<br>The first statement, which is usually used for popular science explanations, is simply too simplified & the devil is in the details here:</p><p>The crux is that for one clock moving past another, it is only possible to directly compare them exactly once - namely when they meet. To infer how fast they go in comparison with each other, we have no choice but to compare them a second time, but then they are at a distance from each other.</p><p>But comparing clocks at a distance is not a unique procedure in relativity and depends on the movement of the comparer!</p><p>The usual procedure is to place two clocks at rest in in the lab frame, and synchronize them in the lab by starting them at the same lab time - for example by sending a light pulse from exactly in the middle between them. But this procedure prefers the lab frame over the say, spaceship frame, and this is precisely where the decision between who moves and who is considered "at rest" in this experiment is taken: in our prescription how to synchronize and compare distant clocks, not in nature. </p><p><a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/physics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>physics</span></a><br><a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/physicsedu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>physicsedu</span></a> <br><a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/scicomm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>scicomm</span></a></p>