@FritzAdalis @scottwilson
That's not accurate. The Information's wording and organization may have confused people.
Para 5 in the Information is about Employee 1, a contractor who worked for PowerSchool. The Information does not say Employee 1 was a telco (Victim 1) employee or that their PS credentials were acquired as part of the telco breach. Para 5 is unrelated to Para 4.
The Employee 1 creds used to access PowerSchool were acquired at a separate time and unrelated to the telco breach. I confirmed that with a source with knowledge of the incident.
The Information: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/media/1400921/dl
Also of note: the Information makes no mention of the second round of extortion attempts, which may mean that DOJ had no evidence connecting Lane to the second set of extortion demands. The second round of extortion demands purported to be from "ShinyHunters," but whether they really were or not has yet to be publicly confirmed or refuted by law enforcement.
#databreach #EduSec #PowerSchool
@douglevin @funnymonkey @mkeierleber @campuscodi