mastouille.fr est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Mastouille est une instance Mastodon durable, ouverte, et hébergée en France.

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

596
comptes actifs

#OAbooks

1 message1 participant0 message aujourd’hui

We are truly honoured to have received a finalist nomination for the 2025 @alpsp Award for Innovation in Publishing 2025!

#MetadataMatters

Hannah and Toby just gave their presentation to the ALPSP panel of judges, and we'll know more in about two months' time, as award winners will be announced at this year's ALPSP Conference in Manchester (Sept 10-11).

Really wonderful to see more and more interest across the sector in what we've been developing within the @copim community - and also good to keep in mind the importance of that growing network of #openinfrastructures that have come together to explore alternative ways to OA publishing of #OAbooks based on interoperable #opendata ...

So this is also a shoutout to the important work happening at @openbookcollect, @PublicKnowledgeProject (with OMP), @crossref, @ORCID_Org, and many others not on Mastodon, incl. OAPEN, DOAB, OaEBU DT, and the OA Switchboard ...

💎 📖 A lire : l’article de Kira Hopkins et @kjsanders qui analyse le développement de la voie diamant pour les livres en se concentrant sur l’exemple anglais et en particulier sur la communauté @copim

iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/a

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly CommunicationOpen access, open infrastructures, and their funding: Learning from histories to more effectively enhance diamond OA ecologies for booksThe decade since the “Bottlenecks in the Open Access System” special issue of JLSC in 2014 has been an expansive one for open access (OA) and OA books in particular. The creation of a scholarly publishing ecosystem that enables works to be freely accessible for readers has been successful in many ways. However, the underlying politics and economics of OA scholarly publishing often remain opaque or under-interrogated (Lawson et al., 2015). The problems with journal OA funding, specifically regarding inequality of access to publishing, discussed by Bonaccorso et al. (2014) in their contribution to that issue, have also increased and become entrenched as we discuss below. This entrenchment has been largely via the growth and consolidation of gold OA, “transformative” agreements, and read-and-publish journal deals, which have effectively, and unnecessarily, commodified OA publications. We would argue that this is in direct tension with some of the foundations of contemporary OA. OA was explicitly described from early principles as not a business model and as aiming to reduce financial barriers from authors, libraries, and other groups (Suber, 2024). We would like to note that, while the main focus of this paper is books, we begin with a discussion of journals. This is because we are focusing on the history, development, and critiques of OA fundings in the intervening ten years following the “Bottlenecks” special issue. OA journal publishing has been at the forefront of discussions of OA funding, and it has dominated the last decade, and more, of this discussion; it would therefore be remiss of us not to discuss this history, the resulting current landscape of inequity, and the potential ramifications if this were to be transferred to OA books, a more nascent field in general.

NEW POST: 'From Permission to Publication: Managing Third-Party Materials in Open Access Books'

Delve into how to tackle third-party materials for OA books with our blog post and list of resources, based on our conversation with an expert panel of authors, publishers, legal experts & GLAM specialists:

openaccessbooksnetwork.hcommon

📣 #Job An der Universitätsbibliothek der @tuberlin suchen wir in meiner Abteilung Publikationsdienste eine*n neue*n Kolleg*in für die Arbeit im @dfg_public Projekt "Servicestelle Diamond #OpenAccess #SeDOA💎 Die 100%-Stelle E11 (TV-L Berl. HS) ist auf 3 Jahre befristet. Schwerpunkt ist die Unterstützung des Publizierens von #OABooks via @berlinup #BerlinUP im Diamond OA #DOA. Alle wichtigsten Infos gibts in der Ausschreibung, Bewerbungsfrist ist der 16.05.2025 👉 jobs.tu-berlin.de/stellenaussc

We know #MetadataMatters for #OpenAccess books - so we're delighted to be co-organising this FREE WEBINAR on 'Good Metadata Practice for #OABooks' with the Open Institutional Publishers Association (OIPA).

📆Thurs 20 March
⏰3pm GMT/4pm CET/11am EDT
🔗us06web.zoom.us/meeting/regist

I will be chairing and I'll be joined by these fantastic speakers:

· Tobias Steiner & Hannah Hillen (@Thoth_metadata)
· Graham Bell (EDItEUR)
· Jeffrey Edmunds (Penn State Libraries)

Suite du fil

Highlights of our work in 2024 include
✅ Continuing to facilitate conosc.org/
✅ Researching #OAbooks policy-making across the ERA with #PALOMERA
✅ Contribution to #RetainYourRights & #Copyright reform with knowledgerights21.org/
✅ Efforts to understand & guide action for sustainable #DiamondOA with diamasproject.eu/
✅ Leadership of #OpenScienceMonitoringInitiative @osmi
✅ Our new project to make the case for a stronger, more integrated open agenda sparceurope.org/connecting-the 2/2

conosc.orgCoNOSC – Council for National Open Science Coordination

Neues Jahr, neuer Job 🤩 Nach knapp 6 Jahren mit dem tollen Team des OABB @openaccess 🌻 bin ich weitergezogen, um #OpenResearch in #Berlin voranzubringen. Jetzt bin ich für die @tuberlin aktiv & leite ab April die Hauptabteilung #Publikationsdienste – 4 großartige Teams 💪 die zentrale Themen für #OpenResearch unterstützen: Dissertationsstelle, #OpenAccess Services, @berlinup #OABooks und Forschungsdatenmanagement #OpenData #FDM. Ich freue mich sehr darauf! #OpenScience

👉 tu.berlin/ub/forschen-publizie

A répondu dans un fil de discussion

@oatp 🙄 Just had a peek at this publication, and tbh, I am not sure if this has been written by a researcher, or some kind of AI ... no source refs provided for ca. 90% of the text, and looking at a couple of randomly-picked snippets such as

"Large-scale OA repositories like Open Book Publishers and OAPEN"

or

"Laika Verlag is known for publishing high-quality scholarly books under an open access model."

just smell really funny ...

Open Book Publishers' name might provide a subtle indication of their main area of work - hint: it starts with a "p" and ends with "ublishing books" - and the latter quote sounds like an actual hallucination ...

To grant them that, Laika actually is an independent publishing house based in Hamburg, but afaik have never really looked into publishing #OAbooks ... 🤷🏽‍♂️

A répondu dans un fil de discussion

📌 What about the #OpenAccess #OABooks Toolkit -- have you checked it out yet? - oabooks-toolkit.org/

“... for researchers as authors of academic books... intended to help authors to better understand open access book publishing and to increase trust in open access books.

... aimed at policy makers... provides a resource to support policy development for #OABooks... should also be of interest to the wider range of stakeholders... e.g., #libraries and #publishers...”

oabooks-toolkit.org/

www.oabooks-toolkit.orgOA Books Toolkit
A répondu dans un fil de discussion

📌 PALOMERA Recommendations for #OpenAccess Books by 25 contributors (all with @ORCID_Org IDs)

“...an extensive set of actionable and aligned recommendations on (#OABooks for)... (1) Research Performing Organisations... and research institutes, (2) Public and private Research Funding Organisations (RFOs), (3) National policymakers, (4) Academic and national libraries, (5) Researchers, (6) Learned societies, (7) Infrastructure providers, and (8) Academic publishers…”

zenodo.org/records/14049032

ZenodoPALOMERA Deliverable 4.2 - The PALOMERA Recommendations for Open Access BooksThe PALOMERA project set out to understand the policy landscape of OA books and the challenges preventing research funders and institutions in particular from including books in their OA policies. One of the project’s main goals was to support the key stakeholders in the field by providing evidence-based, aligned, and actionable recommendations that can help formulate OA book policies. Open Access books are defined here as scholarly, peer-reviewed books including monographs, book chapters, edited collections, critical editions, and other long-form scholarly works. Textbooks and popular science books are seen as a different category, although the policy recommendations could potentially be extended to this category of books as well when they are published Open Access. Open textbooks are deliberately left out from this definition because they require a different process: policies regarding open textbooks must take into account considerations about Open Educational Resources, which are beyond the remit of the PALOMERA project. In Deliverable 4.2, PALOMERA has developed an extensive set of actionable and aligned recommendations on Open Access (OA) books for eight stakeholders: (1) Research Performing Organisations (RPOs) and research institutes, (2) Public and private Research Funding Organisations (RFOs), (3) National policymakers, (4) Academic and national libraries, (5) Researchers, (6) Learned societies, (7) Infrastructure providers, and (8) Academic publishers. These stakeholders are uniquely positioned to drive a transition to OA books by embedding OA principles for books into their policies and strategies. Since the current landscape of OA book policies is characterised by a lack of policy alignment between various relevant stakeholders, this change requires an aligned effort based on policy recommendations for various stakeholders that are grounded in solid evidence. The evidence for these recommendations has been provided by the Knowledge Base developed in WP2, which contains over 650 open access policy and related documents and a set of 40 stakeholder interviews, as well as on the research undertaken in WP3 which provides a unique overview of the OA books policy landscape in Europe. For each set of recommendations, we have defined a timeline by prioritising recommendations in terms of short term (1-2 years), medium term (3 years), and long term (4-5 years) time frames. The project has performed three validation exercises to check the validity of 1) the data collection and methodology; 2) the analytical approach, methodology, and key findings; and 3) the recommendations themselves. This approach was chosen to increase the engagement with all relevant stakeholders and to strengthen the outcomes of PALOMERA. The recommendations integrate the valuable comments of two reviewers, as well as the constructive comments from the subgroup on scholarly communication of the European University Association’s (EUA) Expert Group on Open Science and the LIBER Working Group on Open Access. Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Hooray! The amazing folks over at @investinopen 's Infra Finder have worked really hard during the past months, and updated their list of #OpenInfra tools - and Thoth has been included with up-to-date information 🎉

#OAbooks #MetadataMatters

Infra Finder is a tool designed to increase adoption of and investment in open infrastructure.

Check out our entry and explore IOI's database: infrafinder.investinopen.org/s

punctumbooks.pubpub.org/pub/an

Powerful post on the blog of punctum books by Eileen A. Fradenburg Joy and Vincent W.J. van Gerven Oei engaging with:

1) Sarah Kember and Amy Brand, "The Corporate Capture of Open-Access Publishing," Chronicle of Higher Education, August 16, 2023, chronicle.com/article/the-corp.

as well as two pieces in Culture Machine 23 (2024):

2) Sarah Kember, “Householding: A Feminist Ecological Economics of Publishing,” culturemachine.net/vol-23-publ

3) Jefferson Pooley, “Before Progress: On the Power of Utopian Thinking for Open Access Publishing,” culturemachine.net/wp-content/.

For a briefer initial engagement with Pooley’s piece, see Gary Hall, 'The Pluriversal Politics of Radical Publishing's Scaling Small': garyhall.squarespace.com/journ

punctum books · Antagonize This! The Empty Signification of “Academy-Owned” Publishing in the Neoliberal University

Roller banners? Check! ✅
Posters? Check! ✅
Assortment of flyers, stickers, etc? Check! ✅

Looks like I'm all geared up to catch my train to this year's Frankfurt Book Fair ... Gonna be a couple of interesting days for @Thoth_metadata together with colleagues from @copim @openbookcollect @opening_future and @oapenbooks - we have two booths on site forming a small haven of #nonprofit community-led #openinfra s for #OAbooks ...

Will you be there, too? Why not stop by and say hi! We're in Hall 4.0, booths E69/71!

Nice to see Cambridge University Press unafraid to advertise & highlight a book that has an open access edition (spotted on p.20 of the LRB, vol. 46, no. 18).

The book “Decolonizing the English Literary Curriculum” is available online & open access (link below) cambridge.org/core/books/decol

Remember folks: OA does not diminish print copy sales! Advertising the existence of an OA book is still a good idea, could potentially drive print copy sales.

We've had a wonderful @copim Open Book Futures showcase event yesterday, recapping what our groups / Work Packages (focusing on Experimental Publishing, Archiving & Preservation, Accessibility, Opening the Future, @openbookcollect and Thoth) have been up to those past 18 months #OAbooks #openinfra

@flavoursofopen , our COO, provided an overview of what we've achieved so far with Thoth Open Metadata, and our plans for the next 18 months on Open Book Futures

📢 Important to keep in mind: 👇

Thoth already has a variety of open solutions in place to tackle many of the issues faced by small to medium-sized publishers from across the globe in navigating the complex landscape of the book supply chain.

Wanna know more? Please find our slidedeck at zenodo.org/records/13842746 and be in touch!

Also, don't hesitate to spread the word! #MetadataMatters #openInfrastructure #archiving #DiamondOA #OpenData

ZenodoThoth Open Metadata: An updateIn this presentation Toby Steiner offers an update on Thoth Open Metadata. The slides begin by introducing Thoth and the array of services it offers publishers and libraries. The presentation outlines Thoth's progress during the first 18 months of of the Open Book Futures project, and concludes by considering some next steps.  This presentation was the fourth of seven presentations delivered as part of: Copim’s Open Book Futures project: an update and showcase of our work, on 25 September 2024, 15:00-17:00 (BST). You can find out more about the event on Copim’s PubPub site. Find out more about Copim here: copim.ac.uk