mastouille.fr est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Mastouille est une instance Mastodon durable, ouverte, et hébergée en France.

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

595
comptes actifs

#openlicenses

0 message0 participant0 message aujourd’hui

Very interesting results of #AAAS survey on researcher positions on #OpenLicenses. Note that I'm over 70.
aaas.org/news/interests-concer

<blockquote>
* 42% of respondents — when asked what they prefer to do with #CCBY licensed content where they use it themselves— mentioned actions that don’t necessarily require this license, like reading work, or sharing it in the classroom.
* 29% of respondents say there should be no limitations on the #reuse of peer-reviewed research at all, with those older than 70 years of age feeling most strongly.
* 28% of respondents were concerned about reuses of work with a CC-BY license, largely related to possible misrepresentations of their work. Some cited concerns about misuse of their data for political gain.
* In general, younger researchers were slightly more concerned than their older counterparts about potential downstream misuses of their work.
* With respect to commercial reuses of published work, about 36% indicated that there are cases that excite them, while roughly 63% indicated that there are cases that worry them. The latter group’s concerns relate to the possibility of misrepresentation by media and other groups or individuals; use by unsanctioned entities seeking to make a profit; and training of #AI models without proper attribution.
</blockquote>

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)Interests, Concerns and Knowledge Gaps around Open Licenses | American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)Scientists who publish their research in journals are typically eager for their work to be shared widely, and for that work to be reused to advance knowledge in their field or beyond. As part of this process, many researchers choose open licenses, like CC BY, for their papers.
A répondu dans un fil de discussion

@christof @ElenLeFoll @proghist @creativecommons

After reading through the CC BY license I am none the wiser whether one has to clearly indicate that the material in question had been originally published somewhere else. The DOI as provided by #ProQuest reveals this fact but only after manually parsing the string with a resolver. Readers unfamiliar with the Programming Historian are made to believe that ProQuest is the original publisher or the platform officially hosting the original content.

However, ProQuest clearly violates the attribution requirements by modifying the layout and removing images. The CC BY license explicitly states that “You must […] indicate if You modified the Licensed Material”.

Suite du fil

Update. I first posted this list in 2013, after the fifth letter, and haven't seen any new letters since then. It might be time for a new one, especially one supporting #OpenLicenses and #ReuseRights on work arising from federally funded research.

After I posted the list of five in 2013, Tom Morris created a Google spreadsheet merging and deduping the lists, with links to Wikipedia and the original letters. I'm glad to say that it's still online.
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d

Google DocsNobel Laureates who support Open Access

I just released Methods of Rights Retention, an #OpenAccess Google doc.
bit.ly/MethodsRightsRetention

I wrote it in May and held it for a while to think about what to do with it, for example, move it to my blog or submit it as an article somewhere. But for now I think I'll just release it in this form and consider next steps later.

I hope it's useful. I'd welcome methods, examples, links, or details I might have overlooked.

Google DocsMethods of rights retentionMethods of Rights Retention Peter Suber Note that I’m still revising this doc. Suggested short URL = bit.ly/MethodsRightsRetention 1. Early funder method (Wellcome Trust, NIH) 2. Harvard method 3. Plan S method (cOAlition S) 4. Work-for-hire 5. US federal purpose license 6. Secondary publish...
Suite du fil

Update. The #EuropeanCouncil just adopted the #OpenScience proposal anticipated earlier this month (this thread, above). No #embargoes. No #APCs. #Nonprofit publishing. #OpenLicenses. #OpenInfrastructure. consilium.europa.eu/en/press/p

While this is not yet policy, it's a weighty recommendation to the Commission and member states.

The #EU is funding a feasibility study for an #OpenAccess database of works in the #PublicDomain or carrying #OpenLicenses.
patrick-breyer.de/wp-content/u

One purpose is to increase "opportunities for the #reuse of public domain [and openly-licensed] cultural heritage."

Another is to detect and reduce #CopyFraud. The study could "confirm that there is an actual market failure and…confirm the risk of over-blocking such public domain works."