mastouille.fr est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Mastouille est une instance Mastodon durable, ouverte, et hébergée en France.

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

584
comptes actifs

#connectome

0 message0 participant0 message aujourd’hui
En réponse à katch wreck

@katchwreck For sure we won't understand how the brain works until the role of astrocytes and other glial cells is fully understood.
The #connectome though is understood as the wiring diagram where neurons are nodes and edges are synaptic connections. For additional interactions there's the "#neuromodulome" for e.g., neuropeptide/neuromodulator vs. the corresponding receptor, like in this paper by Lidia Ripoll-Sánchez et al. 2023 on C. elegans:
"The neuropeptidergic connectome of C. elegans" cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896
#neuroscience #Celegans #connectomics

I was reading something the other day about new neurological research suggesting that while the #connectome is the physical foundation of the manifested mind, there may be another level manifested in the electrical fields generated by the synapses firing across the brain. And that’s where the mind lives, in the swirling fields. #AI doesn’t have (yet) an equivalent physical foundation like ours, but when they do, we’re cooked.

Long time in the making: @hhmijanelia Group Leader @srinituraga@threads.net, Janne Lappalainen, Jakob Macke from @unituebingen and colleagues reproduce the network dynamics in the part of the fly visual system responsible for motion detection using end-to-end training on plausible high level tasks. Their model uses reasonable neural dynamics and the FlyEM #connectome as a start and figures out the rest, leading to natural network dynamics. Cool!

nature.com/articles/s41586-024

NatureConnectome-constrained networks predict neural activity across the fly visual system - NatureA study demonstrates how experimental measurements of only the connectivity of a biological neural network can be used to predict neural responses across the fly visual system at single-neuron resolution using deep learning techniques.

Finding suitable embeddings for connectomes (spatially embedded complex networks that map neural connections in the brain) is crucial for analyzing and understanding cognitive processes. Recent studies have found two-dimensional hyperbolic embeddings superior to Euclidean embeddings in modeling connectomes across species, especially human connectomes. However, those studies had limitations: geometries other than Euclidean, hyperbolic, or spherical were not considered. Following William Thurston's suggestion that the networks of neurons in the brain could be successfully represented in Solv geometry, we study the goodness-of-fit of the embeddings for 21 connectome networks (8 species). To this end, we suggest an embedding algorithm based on Simulating Annealing that allows us to embed connectomes to Euclidean, Spherical, Hyperbolic, Solv, Nil, and product geometries. Our algorithm tends to find better embeddings than the state-of-the-art, even in the hyperbolic case. Our findings suggest that while three-dimensional hyperbolic embeddings yield the best results in many cases, Solv embeddings perform reasonably well.

Full video: youtube.com/watch?v=GQKaKF_yOL arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2407.16077 with Tehora Rogue #NonEuclideanGeometry #connectome #RogueViz

We have now published a new and massively extended/reworked preprint of the whole-body #Platynereis larval #connectome with over 50 figures

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

All the analyses, plots and figures should be reproducible in #rstats with the code provided:

zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.

@zenodo_org

by querying our public #CATMAID database:

catmaid.jekelylab.ex.ac.uk

#neuroscience @biology #volumeEM
@biorxivpreprint

En réponse à Albert Cardona

@albertcardona

Thanks for these citations! I like that we can now stop talking about "the #connectome". A single #connectome doesn't exist. Anymore than "a single #genome" does. We need to start seeing species as populations with variability (this is how #evolution works! - by shifting those population distributions around).

As a practical note (coming back from #SFN2023), I'm getting worried about all of the experiments that are taking some specific mouse strain, making some observation (specific connections from a small subset of cells in structure A project to this specific part of structure B), and generalizing from that to all mice (and all rats and all humans). I wonder how much the various very specific connections that are being traced with viral techniques are specific to that "genetic family" of mice and how much variation we should be expecting.

I think we are vastly underestimating the variability in these life forms we are studying.