Créer un compteSe connecter

Recherches récentes

Aucune recherche récente

Options de recherche

Disponible uniquement lorsque vous êtes connecté.
mastouille.fr est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Mastouille est une instance Mastodon durable, ouverte, et hébergée en France.

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

589
comptes actifs

mastouille.fr: À proposAnnuaire des profilsPolitique de confidentialité

Mastodon: À proposTélécharger l’applicationRaccourcis clavierVoir le code sourcev4.3.4

#retraction

1 message1 participant0 message aujourd’hui
Public
François Renaville 🇺🇦🇪🇺

#ThirdIron has just announced a nice advancement in #retraction notification. Now, data about articles which cite one or more retracted articles have been added to #LibKey.

If a paper cites one or more #retractedarticles, LibKey will display an interstitial screen indicating which #citations have been retracted.

mailchi.mp/thirdiron/three-ann

#retractions#discovery#transparency
Public
jbz

🫠 ‘Data manipulations’ alleged in study that paved the way for Microsoft’s quantum chip | Science Magazine

｢ co-author Vincent Mourik had concerns when he saw drafts of the paper. Mourik, now at the Jülich Research Center, found signs that data had been cherry-picked to support the paper’s conclusions and began to question his co-authors more than a year before it was published ｣

science.org/content/article/da

#quantum#microsoft#science
Public
François Renaville 🇺🇦🇪🇺

Linking #citation and #retraction #data reveals the demographics of scientific #retractions among highly cited #authors

journals.plos.org/plosbiology/

journals.plos.orgLinking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authorsRetractions are becoming increasingly common but still account for a small minority of published papers. Using a database that links retractions to the top 2% most highly-cited scientists across science, this study reveals that retraction rates varied by scientific discipline and scientists with retracted publications had younger publication age, higher self-citation rates, and larger publication volumes.
#research#ethics#publishing
Public *
Pascal Hingamp

This has somehow slipped under my radar: "Controversial #COVID study that promoted unproven treatment retracted after four-year saga - Paper on #hydroxychloroquine led by French researcher Didier #Raoult is second-most-cited study ever to be withdrawn."
"Overall, the IHU now has 32 retracted papers — 28 of them authored by Raoult — and 230 other studies with expressions of concern."
doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-040 #IHU #HCQ #retraction #Marseille #AMU

Screen shot of the retracted article on the publisher's website (Elsevier)
Public
François Renaville 🇺🇦🇪🇺

#WithdrarXiv: A Large-Scale #Dataset for #Retraction Study

arxiv.org/abs/2412.03775

arXiv.orgWithdrarXiv: A Large-Scale Dataset for Retraction StudyRetractions play a vital role in maintaining scientific integrity, yet systematic studies of retractions in computer science and other STEM fields remain scarce. We present WithdrarXiv, the first large-scale dataset of withdrawn papers from arXiv, containing over 14,000 papers and their associated retraction comments spanning the repository's entire history through September 2024. Through careful analysis of author comments, we develop a comprehensive taxonomy of retraction reasons, identifying 10 distinct categories ranging from critical errors to policy violations. We demonstrate a simple yet highly accurate zero-shot automatic categorization of retraction reasons, achieving a weighted average F1-score of 0.96. Additionally, we release WithdrarXiv-SciFy, an enriched version including scripts for parsed full-text PDFs, specifically designed to enable research in scientific feasibility studies, claim verification, and automated theorem proving. These findings provide valuable insights for improving scientific quality control and automated verification systems. Finally, and most importantly, we discuss ethical issues and take a number of steps to implement responsible data release while fostering open science in this area.
#retractions#research#integrity
Public
Jocelyn Etienne

I was reading an article in #LeMonde which referred to a couple of scientific papers. One of them was cited by its link to #PMC, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/

However, #retractionWatch tells of the #retraction of this paper retractionwatch.com/2015/07/21

On the #publisher's page, the only sign of the #retraction is a link on the side "Authors’ Explanation of the Retraction" and pdf file is not tagged in any way—it even has an "update" banner leading to this below.

Is this common??

lemonde.fr/intimites/article/2

CrossMark banner says "document is current" for a paper retracted 9 years ago.
A répondu dans un fil de discussion
Public *
Jocelyn

@rebeccasear
"if their conclusions hinged on now-retracted results, they should be corrected or #retracted as appropriate”

The story I know of someone trying to correct a paper whose results were only partly affected by 3rd-party fault is not encouraging...
This was more than 10 years ago, but I'm not sure policies have much evolved, have they?

#retraction #scientificPublishing

nature.com/articles/nj7492-389

NatureRetractions: A clean slate - NatureMistakes are part of science. But setting the record straight promptly and clearly can help to avoid a career blot.
ExplorerFlux en direct
À propos