mastouille.fr est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Mastouille est une instance Mastodon durable, ouverte, et hébergée en France.

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

597
comptes actifs

#retraction

0 message0 participant0 message aujourd’hui

#ThirdIron has just announced a nice advancement in #retraction notification. Now, data about articles which cite one or more retracted articles have been added to #LibKey.

If a paper cites one or more #retractedarticles, LibKey will display an interstitial screen indicating which #citations have been retracted.

mailchi.mp/thirdiron/three-ann

🫠 ‘Data manipulations’ alleged in study that paved the way for Microsoft’s quantum chip | Science Magazine

「 co-author Vincent Mourik had concerns when he saw drafts of the paper. Mourik, now at the Jülich Research Center, found signs that data had been cherry-picked to support the paper’s conclusions and began to question his co-authors more than a year before it was published 」

science.org/content/article/da

This has somehow slipped under my radar: "Controversial #COVID study that promoted unproven treatment retracted after four-year saga - Paper on #hydroxychloroquine led by French researcher Didier #Raoult is second-most-cited study ever to be withdrawn."
"Overall, the IHU now has 32 retracted papers — 28 of them authored by Raoult — and 230 other studies with expressions of concern."
doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-040 #IHU #HCQ #retraction #Marseille #AMU

arXiv.orgWithdrarXiv: A Large-Scale Dataset for Retraction StudyRetractions play a vital role in maintaining scientific integrity, yet systematic studies of retractions in computer science and other STEM fields remain scarce. We present WithdrarXiv, the first large-scale dataset of withdrawn papers from arXiv, containing over 14,000 papers and their associated retraction comments spanning the repository's entire history through September 2024. Through careful analysis of author comments, we develop a comprehensive taxonomy of retraction reasons, identifying 10 distinct categories ranging from critical errors to policy violations. We demonstrate a simple yet highly accurate zero-shot automatic categorization of retraction reasons, achieving a weighted average F1-score of 0.96. Additionally, we release WithdrarXiv-SciFy, an enriched version including scripts for parsed full-text PDFs, specifically designed to enable research in scientific feasibility studies, claim verification, and automated theorem proving. These findings provide valuable insights for improving scientific quality control and automated verification systems. Finally, and most importantly, we discuss ethical issues and take a number of steps to implement responsible data release while fostering open science in this area.

I was reading an article in #LeMonde which referred to a couple of scientific papers. One of them was cited by its link to #PMC, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/

However, #retractionWatch tells of the #retraction of this paper retractionwatch.com/2015/07/21

On the #publisher's page, the only sign of the #retraction is a link on the side "Authors’ Explanation of the Retraction" and pdf file is not tagged in any way—it even has an "update" banner leading to this below.

Is this common??

lemonde.fr/intimites/article/2

A répondu dans un fil de discussion

@rebeccasear
"if their conclusions hinged on now-retracted results, they should be corrected or #retracted as appropriate”

The story I know of someone trying to correct a paper whose results were only partly affected by 3rd-party fault is not encouraging...
This was more than 10 years ago, but I'm not sure policies have much evolved, have they?

#retraction #scientificPublishing

nature.com/articles/nj7492-389

NatureRetractions: A clean slate - NatureMistakes are part of science. But setting the record straight promptly and clearly can help to avoid a career blot.

A Call for Retraction: The Recent American Psychologist Article on Antisemitism

"In sum, given the many identified shortcomings, it is perplexing to me that the American Psychologist accepted this article in its current form. In my view, its publication in a premier scholarly journal now lends unwarranted credibility to the authors’ questionable analysis of antisemitism — a critically important issue. Furthermore, I am deeply concerned that the unsubstantiated discrediting of individuals and groups distressed by the real-world consequences of Israel’s assault on Gaza can further endanger lives and set back the pursuit of a just peace." Roy Eidelson

royeidelson.com/a-call-for-ret

#antisemitism #APA #AmericanPsychologist #JewishVoiceForPeace #IfNotNow #AmericanJews #PalestineSolidarity #IHRA #JerusalemDeclarationOnAntisemitism #JDA #BDS #psychologists #retraction #OpinionsAreNotFacts @israel @palestine #JusticeForPalestine #FarRight #zionism

royeidelson.comA Call for Retraction: The Recent American Psychologist Article on Antisemitism – Roy Eidelson