Mastouille

Dendrobatus AzureusToday I learned the following. Journaling and journaling are two separate distinctly separate manners of keeping file systems in Sync.When microsoft talks about journaling in NTFS you should never, ever think about the robust journaling system that Ext4 hasIn comparison EXT4 journaling is a god while en NTFS journaling is not even an antI have EXT4 file systems connected to an extremely unstable machine. This thing crashes to green screens more than 64 times a day.{It's a Gigabyte Mini PC in case you're interested never buy those. The machine came with overheating errors from the beginning. The factory installed a fan for the APU which is not even suitable for a GPU that was made a decade ago}I've not even lost one bit of data on those EXT4 file systems.Those NTFS file systems with journaling? I lost all of them. All NTFS file systems were lostI didn't lose data because I have backups the file systems just keeled over simply because the machine kept rebooting Thank you for being so robust EXT4 <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Journal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Journal</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/filesystem" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#filesystem</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/OpenSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#OpenSource</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/NTFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#NTFS</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/ClosedSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ClosedSource</a>

ricardo :mastodon:<a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> For <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Linux</a> 6.16 Brings A Change Yielding "Really Stupendous Performance" <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.16-EXT4-Performance" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.16-EXT4-Performance</a>

MikaI've managed to get <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/OpenMediaVault" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#OpenMediaVault</a> working on my <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/RaspberryPi" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#RaspberryPi</a> (running <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Raspbian" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Raspbian</a> Lite) and the performance seems pretty impressive! Despite relying on USB storage for the SSDs. This is my first time running a <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/NAS" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#NAS</a> on the Pi, on <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/OMV" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#OMV</a>, not using <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/ZFS" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ZFS</a> or <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/RAID" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#RAID</a> but rather an <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Unraid" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Unraid</a> like solution, 'cept, <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/FOSS" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#FOSS</a> called <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/SnapRAID" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#SnapRAID</a> in combination with <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/mergerfs" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#mergerfs</a> (the drives themselves are simply <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/EXT4" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a>). So far, honestly, so good. I got 2x 1TB SSDs for data, and another 1TB SSD for parity. Don't have a backup for the data themselves atm, but I do have a scheduled backup solution (<a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/RaspiBackup" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#RaspiBackup</a>) setup for the OS itself (SD card). It's also got <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Timeshift" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Timeshift</a> for creating daily snapshots. I'm not out of the woods yet though, cos after this comes the (somewhat) scary part, deploying <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Immich" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Immich</a> on the Pi lol. I really could just deploy it in my <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Proxmox" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Proxmox</a> <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/homelab" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#homelab</a>, and I wouldn't have to worry about system resources or hardware transcoding, etc. but I really wanna experiment this 'everything hosted/contained in 1 Pi' concept.

Khurram Wadee ✅So, I’ve basically reinstalled the system from a USB drive and am now restoring <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/backups" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#backups</a>. Luckily, I backed up all the <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/Dotfiles" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Dotfiles</a> and configurations and so the <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/desktop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#desktop</a> is behaving as before, which is a big relief. On the up side, it’s booting a lot faster and the <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/disk" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#disk</a> has <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/btrfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#btrfs</a> <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/partition" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#partition</a>, rather than <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/Ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Ext4</a>.<a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/Fedora42" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Fedora42</a> <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/F42" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#F42</a>

Saemon ZixelНечаянно удалил все файлы в папке сайта на сервере. В прошлый раз я потерял очень ценный рабочий скрипт-файл и это было в позапрошлом году. Extundelete и testdisk ни черта не помогли. Не тогда, не в этот раз. Пришлось опять через grep искать по подстроке на всём жёстком диске содержимое файла.Вот примерная строка запуска, если кому надо: grep --binary-files=text --context=1350 'SELECT * FROM posts WHERE post_hidden < 2' /dev/sda1 > found_data1Ext4 конечно плоха в этом плане. ReiserFS 3.6 раньше позволяла почти все удалённые файлы восстановить. Интересно как в этом плане дела обстоят у BtrFS и XFS?<a href="https://lor.sh/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#linux</a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/undelete" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#undelete</a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ext4</a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/grep" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#grep</a>

Khurram Wadee ✅Anyway, I was having big issues with trying to create an <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> file system and the same problem was occurring on multiple devices, indicating that it wasn’t the device that was at fault and I concluded that it must be something to do with <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/mkfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#mkfs</a>.ext4.

devSJR :python: :rstats:Thanks <a href="https://linuxmom.net/@vkc" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@vkc</a> <Start/tip nobody asked for> For those who want something close to Debian testing, <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/siduction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#siduction</a> (by default <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/KDE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#KDE</a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Plasma6" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Plasma6</a>) might be worth a try. It is unstable (Codename: Sid), thus before testing. This means it is tested but, it is certainly not as stable as testing. But here is the twist. Use it with <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/btrfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#btrfs</a> or <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/timeshift" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#timeshift</a> and <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ext4</a> to have efficient tools for a rollback once it breaks (and it will break sporadically) and you should be good. <End/tip nobody asked for>

keetSo, I'm currently installing WSL in an attempt to get Windows 11 to view various ext4 filesystems, as I do a lot of stuff with Rasperry Pi machines. This feels...kinda wrong. I hope it works though. I know just enough to be dangerous, but not enough to be a true expert.<a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/WSL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#WSL</a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/Windows" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Windows</a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/RaspberryPi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#RaspberryPi</a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ext4</a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/dunning_kruger" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#dunning_kruger</a>

Khurram Wadee ✅I wonder if anyone can help me with a <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/USB" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#USB</a> issue. I’ve got a new flash drive on which I want to put a Linux directory structure on {with <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a>, encrypted if possible). However, using the <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/GNOME" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#GNOME</a> <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/disks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#disks</a> utility to <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/Format" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Format</a> it apparently works but when I go into the disk’s root directory, I can’t create any files – I get an input/output error. If I reformat the disk as a <a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/tags/FAT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#FAT</a> (windows(disk then it works again and so I’m thinking there must be some problem with the utility I’m using.

Jan SchaumannSystem AdministrationWeek 3, Additional ReadingGUID Partition Table (GPT) <a href="https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/05_GUID_Partition_Table_Format.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/05_GUID_Partition_Table_Format.html</a>The Security War in File Systems: An Empirical Study from A Vulnerability-centric Perspective <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3606020" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3606020</a>And to dive a bit deeper into <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ext4</a> and FFS.Understanding ext4 Disk Layout: <a href="https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/post/understanding-ext4-disk-layout-part-1" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/post/understanding-ext4-disk-layout-part-1</a>ext4 Data Structures and Algorithms: <a href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/ext4/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/ext4/</a>A Brief History of the BSD Fast Filesystem: <a href="https://freebsdfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/A-Brief-History-of-the-BSD-Fast-Filesystem.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://freebsdfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/A-Brief-History-of-the-BSD-Fast-Filesystem.pdf</a><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/SysAdmin" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#SysAdmin</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/DevOps" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#DevOps</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/SRE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#SRE</a>

jhxAs someone who lost data before (multiple times) I went for a overkill solution. 😎 Currently in the works: - <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/ZFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ZFS</a> Mirror 2 x 4TB SSD - Directly attached 2TB SSD via a USB adapter (Running backup leveraging <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/rsync" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#rsync</a> every day) - Offsite 4TB spinning disk that get's plugged in every week (Also using <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/rsync" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#rsync</a> here)<a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/FreeBSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#FreeBSD</a> and <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/ZFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ZFS</a> keeps my data safe and a disaster strategy is also in place.Btw, three different filesystems used (<a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/ZFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ZFS</a>, <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a>, <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/UFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#UFS</a>) :freebsd: Better safe than sorry I'd say! 😉

Richard "RichiH" Hartmann<a href="https://chaos.social/tags/Debian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Debian</a> question: my systems are all using the... not-non-user-hostile... defaults of encrypted LVM partitions, so I have ~250MB of /boot with <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ext4</a>. My / is <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/XFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#XFS</a> so I can't move /boot. I have closed <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/nvidia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#nvidia</a> drivers via <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/dkms" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#dkms</a>, maybe that matters.I used to be able to juggle two kernels, one installed, one to be installed. That fails now, I am stuck.Are there any good and modern docs on reducing <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#linux</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/kernel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#kernel</a> footprint in /boot?I can find old stuff, empty stuff, and whataboutism, no docs...

Kevin Karhan :verified:<a href="https://mastodon.neilzone.co.uk/@neil" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@neil</a> <a href="https://m.ai6yr.org/@ai6yr" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@ai6yr</a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/@restic" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@restic</a> I'd say an external <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SATA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#SATA</a>-SSD in an enclosure with <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/brtfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#brtfs</a> or "journalless <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ext4</a>" works fine.<ul><li>Maybe consider a cheap multi-port case with <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/HDDs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#HDDs</a> and using <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/dmraid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#dmraid</a> for <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RAID" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#RAID</a>-based failsafe?</li></ul>

SP⟁CED GO⟁TBeen reading up a bit trying to decide which file system I want to use when I redo my home server soon. Think I'm leaning towards giving btrfs a go. Curious what the splits are on fedi. I've only ever used ext4 on Linux. I'm guessing for desktop/home server use, xfs isn't very popular. Just including it here since it's in this article. <a href="https://appdot.net/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://appdot.net/tags/FileSystems" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#FileSystems</a> <a href="https://appdot.net/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a href="https://appdot.net/tags/BTRFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#BTRFS</a> <a href="https://appdot.net/tags/ZFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ZFS</a> <a href="https://appdot.net/tags/XFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#XFS</a><a href="https://blog.usro.net/2024/10/linux-file-systems-comparison/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://blog.usro.net/2024/10/linux-file-systems-comparison/</a>

Natasha Nox 🇺🇦🇵🇸What's the best solution to have something like RAID1 with three very different disks but one disk being the "main" one worked on and the other two mere mirrors? 🤔 Preferably with very little overhead and encryption support. <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/btrfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#btrfs</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/zfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#zfs</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ext4</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/luks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#luks</a>

Alexey SkobkinТем временем, я на днях забекапил на временный RAID 5 из новых дисков LUKS лежащий на RAID 6 и прошёлся e2fsck по файловой системе лежащей в нём.В режиме "-p" оно отказывалось что-либо делать требуя альтернативные суперблоки даже когда я их давал, но я включил слабоумие и отвагу и запустил в режиме "-y". Спустя несколько часов восстановление закончилось и раздел подмонтировался.Так что пока что привёл сервер в полуживой режим - выключил все контейнеры, которые дрочат ФС большим количеством IO и/или пишут туда.Жду последнего диска для нового RAID 6 и буду перетягивать файлики на новое место.В это же время у меня подходит к концу гарантийный срок на ИБП пока сервисный центр ждёт, что я его привезу, т.к. они наконец-то получили новый вентилятор.Думаю, несложно догадаться, что я не хочу делать важные операции с данными без ИБП - так что расписание у меня, судя по всему, плотненькое 😩<a href="https://lor.sh/tags/hardware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#hardware</a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/server" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#server</a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/HDD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#HDD</a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/RAID" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#RAID</a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/recovery" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#recovery</a>

FellWTF? It appears that ditching BTRFS for EXT4 also fixed a GPU rendering issue I had with Steam? What? How?<a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/Steam" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Steam</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/BTRFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#BTRFS</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Linux</a>

Fell**I converted my gaming PC from BTRFS to EXT4 and this happened:** (I'm not even kidding)✅ Steam startup issues fixed ✅ Wine startup issues fixed ✅ Weird system freezes gone ✅ Vastly improved storage performance ✅ System feels 100x more responsiveI used to be a huge fan of BTRFS, but *boy* does it feel good to be back on EXT4. I guess new isn't always better.<a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/Steam" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Steam</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/Wine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Wine</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/BTRFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#BTRFS</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/GamingOnLinux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#GamingOnLinux</a> <a href="https://ma.fellr.net/tags/LinuxGaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#LinuxGaming</a>

ricardo :mastodon:<a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> Extsize Hints Being Worked On As Step Toward Non-Torn/Atomic Writes <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/EXT4-Extsize-Hints-RFC" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.phoronix.com/news/EXT4-Extsize-Hints-RFC</a>

ricardo :mastodon:An Initial Benchmark Of <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Bcachefs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Bcachefs</a> vs. <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Btrfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Btrfs</a> vs. <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> vs. <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/F2FS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#F2FS</a> vs. <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/XFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#XFS</a> On <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Linux</a> 6.11<a href="https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-611-filesystems" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-611-filesystems</a>

Recherches récentes

Options de recherche

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

#ext4